what compares to the performance of a mercedes c63s amg

With this being the terminal generation of the V8-powered Mercedes-AMG C63 S, it was a perfect opportunity to see who would take the title before the get-go of a new era.

These two rear-wheel drive beasts, and historical rivals, stack up so similarly on paper that I expected an ballsy battle on the rail besides. Would that exist the example?

Yes, there has been so much talk about the looks of the BMW M4 Competition, just I wanted to put that to one side and focus purely on the driving experience and outright pace of these two incredible machines.

Track summary

Both of these cars come into this showdown every bit contenders to push quite a few other cars downwardly the ranks on the CarExpert Leaderboard.

Looking at the performance numbers, yous would look meridian five to exist the target. It would ultimately come downwardly to which contender could transfer those numbers to the track best, via two heavily stressed rear tyres.

The Mercedes-AMG C63 Due south has always been male monarch of the torque bend, with the BMW M4 Competition focused more on driver dynamics. Both factors are incredibly valuable in your driving experience and for on-track performance.

Ane would exceed all expectations.

Road summary

I have spent plenty of time with a Mercedes-AMG C63 S on the road in the past, and it's hard to deny what a vivid packet it is. Instant power with a lively rear end, to keep you more than entertained while still offer everyday usability.

The BMW M4 is a vehicle I am non equally familiar with, but quickly grew addicted of, albeit in a dissimilar way. The M4 is asking to be driven difficult all the time, it is virtually impossible to simply cruise along.

In that location was a certain sense of urgency the whole time and although I couldn't say in that location was a huge departure in the ride quality between the two cars, the BMW M4 seemed a little more than on edge, fifty-fifty when y'all didn't really need it to be.

Engines

With numbers so similar, it's amazing how differently each engine performs.

They each offering 375kW of power apiece, achieved at 6250rpm.

The Mercedes-AMG's college-displacement engine manages more torque: 700Nm from 2000 to 4500rpm, versus 650Nm for the BMW – albeit in the Bimmer'southward example available over a wider superlative band from 2750rpm to remarkably loftier 5500rpm.

The Mercedes-AMG's four.0-litre twin-turbo V8 power feels almost instant, as soon equally you ask for it, it'due south in that location and with and so much torque you accept to be ready to react straight abroad.

Being up a gear is the smartest way to deal with calming it down, but it is difficult not to grinning every time you printing the throttle.

The BMW M4 Contest on the other hand, with its 3.0-litre twin-turbo inline-vi, is a lot more focused on the upper end of the rev range. It has the driveability downwardly low and and so simply continues that all the way to the shift point.

You really accept useful power the whole style and fifty-fifty though information technology has less torque, the curve seems a lot wider and overlaps very smoothly with the power bend. This makes it less shocking every bit an experience, just more complete equally a packet.

Interestingly, it actually seems BMW may have been slightly pessimistic with its numbers, or the ability loss through the drive line is minimal, because the performance in a straight line was conspicuously at an reward over the Mercedes-AMG.

The BMW M4 Competition consistently did low 4-sec 0-100km/h times, with a all-time of 4.09 seconds versus the manufacturer merits of 3.9 seconds. By contrast the Mercedes-AMG C63 S only managed 4.63 seconds against the same merits of 3.9 seconds.

If you're just looking for sound and entertainment, the Mercedes AMG C63 S wins hands down, but the BMW M4 Contest's engine is the more complete package.

Braking

As with the engine numbers, the braking numbers are very close, with only one metre and 0.09 of a 2nd difference from 100-0km/h (BMW 34.94m in 2.7sec versus the Mercedes-AMG's 36.08m in 2.81sec). Yet, the experiences were completely different.

Both vehicles had carbon-ceramic brakes optioned and were incredibly consequent on the rails every bit you would expect.

The BMW M4 Competition did take the upper hand due to its brake pedal feel and control – as shut as you could get to a race automobile feel, while even so being useful everyday. The manner I could modulate and control the release of the brakes on the way into the corner was absolutely spot on.

The Mercedes-AMG C63 S had a longer pedal travel and that only lost me a little flake of confidence. On the route y'all wouldn't even notice this as a trouble, just when it comes downwards to the detail of nailing your corner entry on the track, it makes it a chip more than challenging.

Chassis

It'southward starting to become clear that these two cars were really designed with two completely different philosophies in heed, and their respective chassis' proved no exception.

The Mercedes-AMG C63 S has really expert front grip, combined with a very stable and supported rear terminate. This balance makes it incredibly easy to slide and you have to be mindful of that all the time.

On corner entry you barely have to add any steering to get rotation started, the problem is the rear simply wants to come up around nearly too easily and it is very difficult to attack without losing the rear finish.

Despite it beingness so oversteer-focused, when y'all had the traction control on a reasonable level and managed the ability delivery, you could really still push pretty hard. But I still had to be careful not to overdrive it.

Now the BMW M4 Competition was on another level, so much more precise and balanced. Everything feels connected and working in harmony, and I loved how controlled all the movements were.

The rear cease would settle and then nicely and control some of the shock going to the rear tyres as y'all went on throttle, and the forepart end was super precise without beingness over reactive. It was so easy to balance the automobile all the way through the corner and it was really upwards to the driver rather than the car to make up one's mind the outcome.

The cracking matter well-nigh both chassis' is that the 2 manufacturers have not tried to hide their tendencies. Both really gave great feedback and were incredibly controllable fifty-fifty when well beyond the limit.

Transmissions and differentials

At that place has been quite a large change for this generation of BMW M4, going away from the DCT and towards a more user-friendly eight-speed sports automatic. The Mercedes-AMG C63 S has a nine-speed multi-clutch transmission that fits somewhere between a DCT and automated.

Both were splendid, and despite having more than enough gears to choose from, it never seemed that I was having to make too many shifts and I basically used the same gears on each corner across both cars.

On the rail, I enjoyed the experience from the Mercedes MCT just that fraction more. It was more engaging to drive and felt a bit more than reactive and slightly quicker with the shifts.

The just criticism of the Mercedes-AMG transmission is because the torque curve sits slightly lower in the rev range, I institute that it didn't fall into the peak torque on upshifts, which would injure the acceleration a little bit.

The differentials in the ii cars are both outstanding, all the same achieve the result using dissimilar technology. The Mercedes-AMG C63 S uses a mechanical LSD, while the BMW M4 Competition uses an Active M Differential, which is electronically controlled.

They catch the slip in a controlled and subtle manner, which is a challenge given the level of torque being applied.

The BMW M4 Competition just edges out the Mercedes-AMG C63 South in this surface area, due to the progression at the early phase of locking. It was only a fraction more progressive in its control, which allowed me to really balance the machine nicely.

Suspension

The Mercedes-AMG, despite existence the more than road-friendly car, was a chip more reactive on the track.

I went with the slightly softer Sport setting, non the fully aggressive Sport+, and still suffered a chip on the bumps. The rear suspension was relatively firm compared to the front end, which gave the oversteer rest I spoke about with the chassis.

The BMW M4 Competition suspension is almost every bit skillful equally it gets. It had the command I wanted, without any harshness, and although it was house, information technology didn't react off the bumps. This is so confidence inspiring as a driver and actually enables you to assail and get away with little mistakes.

I likewise went for the slightly softer Sport suspension option in the BMW M4 Competition, which was the perfect compromise for the rails nosotros apply.

Steering

The Mercedes-AMG C63 South edges out the BMW M4 Competition in this area. It gave more feedback through the wheel and is really nicely weighted.

Even though the BMW M4 Competition steering does lack a bit of feedback, information technology is incredibly precise and linear, meaning you have absolute command over the front finish.

Wheels and Tyres

As is then often the case, the tyres that are fitted play a big part in the upshot of the examination. Despite both cars running Michelin tyres, the BMW uses the rail-focused Cup 2s where the Mercedes-AMG uses the more balanced Super Sports.

The Mercedes-AMG C63 S actually has slightly narrower front tyres – 255/35 R19 v 275/35 R19 – but doesn't experience like it needs more front grip, considering of the oversteer chassis balance. The rear tyre sizes are identical, at 285/thirty R20.

You actually experience like you have to warm up the Loving cup 2 tyres on the BMW M4 Competition and they stayed incredibly consistent over the runs. The first lap was virtually identical to the last one.

The Mercedes AMG C63 S is naturally hard on the rear tyres, and it came downwards to the offset lap of each outing to get the all-time time. Fifty-fifty then BMW M4 Contest just had a grip reward everywhere, due to the tyres.

Commuter Aids (Electronics)

I think both manufacturers have washed an amazing chore with the driver aids.

The fact they both have adjustable traction control is and then awesome. I could really dial them in for the runway we were on, and information technology really brings some racing technology to route cars.

I had the conviction to turn the stability control off on both cars and just rely on the traction control to aid if I got a bit too greedy on the throttle.

I never felt like either system was interfering with my driving, it was merely there to support me an actually make the task of driving the cars fast, easier.

• Mercedes-AMG C63 South

Cockpit (Ergonomics)

The Mercedes-AMG's seats are comfortable and offer very good back up on the track besides.

I absolutely love the wheel which is a bit out there with carbon and Alcantara, simply its part, size and shape are spot on. Aforementioned thing with the mode buttons on the wheel, as well as the ability to arrange the traction control from the bicycle when in Race manner.

The shift light is nice and clear, yet also subtle at the same time, which goes with the vibe of the car.

The interior of the BMW M4 Competition is so dramatically different to the Mercedes-AMG C63 S.

• BMW M4 Contest

The seats are maybe my favourite of any road car seat, on a track. They are aggressive and comfy: I was positioned low and angled dorsum, without the slightest bit of movement when pushing hard. You also take a removable headrest slice, so your helmet doesn't get pushed forrard.

The BMW G steering wheel is simply a fleck thicker than I like and I would accept preferred an Alcantara finish as my palms got pretty sweaty at the stride we were going. I practise like the M buttons on the wheel, so that you can take pre-selected modes ready to go when you head out on the track.

Having the ability to adjust the traction control on the bike would have been awesome, as yous have to get into the settings to do this. The nuance is actually cool and modern, with nice clear shift lights and gear number, which are the 2 things I care about most.

Still as proficient equally the BMW M4 Contest seats are, the Mercedes-AMG C63 South's interior is definitely a bit more liveable for everyday use.

Lap fourth dimension

I am pretty sure you will accept guessed which style this is heading, but there are no losers here. These are but two very well-engineered and exciting cars, that are on two very dissimilar paths.

The lap fourth dimension the BMW M4 Competition managed blew my heed, as did the experience of driving it on the track. 55.55 seconds puts it into tertiary place on the CarExpert Leaderboard, just over one-half a 2nd behind the Porsche 911 GT3 RS – and I found it fifty-fifty easier to get a lap time out of than the Porsche.

The Mercedes-AMG C63 South did a very respectable 57.33-2nd lap, placing information technology sixth on the leaderboard, in between the BMW M8 Competition and the BMW M550i.

The tyres obviously played a role in some of the time difference, just even so the BMW M4 Competition is on another level on the track.

The ultimate answer comes downwards to what you are after in a motorcar. The BMW M4 Competition is a knife-border race motorcar that you tin can drive on the route, the Mercedes-AMG C63 Due south is an ballsy road car that can handle some track outings also. Both are incredibly well engineered and you tin can't go wrong either way.

I still tin't become over how quick that M4 was, and I like winning, then that's my pick!

Atko's 3

Mercedes-AMG C63 Southward:

1. This car is born to oversteer, throttle control is key to doing a good lap
2. Use a gear higher to manage to torque delivery
3. If you lot want to track this car, go for a tyre upgrade

 BMW M4 Competition:

1. Use the technology to your advantage, the traction control organisation really helps
2. Remember to warm up the tyres, these are non your ordinary road tyres
3. Y'all must take it to the track to actually experience what BMW has created hither

BMW M4 Competition

Pros:

• Unbelievable dynamics on the track
• Brake control equally good as it gets
• Engine outperforms expectations

Cons:

• Steering could accept more feedback
• 'Sports Automatic' transmission not equally exciting as DCT
• Feels out of place on the road at normal speeds

Mercedes-AMG C63 S

Pros:

• Epic engine that sounds amazing
• MCT manual is user-friendly and super sharp
• Keen residuum of comfort and operation

Cons:

• Standard tyres let information technology down on the track
• Oversteer balance makes it hard to practise a quick lap
• Brakes miss control at the limit

Click the images for the full gallery

More: Everything BMW M4
More: Everything Mercedes-AMG C63

gloversnack1996.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-comparisons/2022-bmw-m4-competition-v-mercedes-amg-c63-s-track-comparison

Share this post